Skip to main content

CIPR

  • Home
  • About
    • Annual reports
  • People
    • Executives
    • Academics
    • Professional staff
    • Research officers
    • Visitors
      • Past visitors
    • Current PhD students
    • Graduated PhD students
  • Publications
    • Policy Insights: Special Series
    • Commissioned Reports
    • Working Papers
    • Discussion Papers
    • Topical Issues
    • Research Monographs
    • 2011 Census papers
    • 2016 Census papers
    • People on Country
    • Talk, Text and Technology
    • Culture Crisis
    • The Macquarie Atlas of Indigenous Australia
    • Indigenous Futures
    • Information for authors
  • Events
    • Workshops
    • Event series
  • News
  • Students
    • Study with us
  • Research
    • Key research areas
    • Visiting Indigenous Fellowship
    • Past projects
      • Indigenous Researcher-in-Residence
      • Sustainable Indigenous Entrepreneurs
      • Indigenous Population
        • Publications
        • 2011 Lecture Series
      • New Media
        • Western Desert Special Speech Styles Project
      • People On Country
        • Project overview
          • Advisory committee
          • Funding
          • Research partners
          • Research team
        • Project partners
          • Dhimurru
          • Djelk
          • Garawa
          • Waanyi/Garawa
          • Warddeken
          • Yirralka Rangers
          • Yugul Mangi
        • Research outputs
          • Publications
          • Reports
          • Newsletters
          • Project documents
      • Indigenous Governance
        • Publications
        • Annual reports
        • Reports
        • Case studies
        • Newsletters
        • Occasional papers
        • Miscellaneous documents
      • Education Futures
        • Indigenous Justice Workshop
        • Research outputs
        • Research summaries
  • Contact us

Research Spotlight

  • Zero Carbon Energy
    • Publications and Submissions
  • Market value for Indigenous Knowledge
  • Indigenous public servants
  • Urban Indigenous Research Network
    • About
    • People
    • Events
    • News
    • Project & Networks
      • ANU Women in Indigenous Policy and Law Research Network (WIPLRN)
      • ANU Development and Governance Research Network (DGRNET)
      • Reconfiguring New Public Management
        • People
        • NSW survey
    • Publications
    • Contact

Related Sites

  • ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences
  • Research School of Social Sciences
  • Australian National Internships Program

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomeResearchPublicationsThe Comparative Economic Status of CDEP and Non-CDEP Community Residents In The Northern Territory In 1991
The comparative economic status of CDEP and non-CDEP community residents in the Northern Territory in 1991
Author/editor: Altman, JC, Hunter, B
Year published: 1996
Issue no.: 107

Abstract

The Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) scheme is a program where participants forego social security entitlements and work for rough equivalents of these entitlements. The scheme has expanded rapidly over the past decade and now operates in 250 Indigenous communities. While the scheme has multiple objectives, it is arguably primarily a labour market program. While there is a growing body of research about the scheme, key research and policy questions about the labour market effects of the scheme on participating communities, in contrast to other communities, have never been asked.

This paper represents the first attempt to compare labour market outcomes at a sample of CDEP and non-CDEP communities in the Northern Territory. This exercise is undertaken with community profile data (on Indigenous people only) from the 1991 Census: ten CDEP and nine nearby non-CDEP communities are compared. Five variables – labour force status, industry structure, occupational status, sector of employment and income status – are analysed.

The paper's results are potentially of considerable policy significance. While official employment levels at CDEP communities are predictably higher than at non-CDEP communities, these levels exceed the direct effect of scheme participation. However, income status at CDEP communities is a little lower than at non-CDEP communities, a puzzling outcome given the options to earn additional income when participating in the scheme. Another puzzling outcome, counter to the views of some researchers, is that there is little statistical evidence of the scheme being used as a substitution funding regime. It is recommended that results are treated with caution given the regional focus of this exploratory analysis.

ISBN: 0 7315 1781 4

ISSN:1036 1774

File attachments

AttachmentSize
1996_DP107_0.pdf(3.56 MB)3.56 MB